Ontario Proposes to Amend the Business Corporations Act
October 22, 2020
Finally, director residency requirements to be removed and shareholder approval thresholds modernized, making Ontario more competitive with other jurisdictions
There is one law on the books in Ontario (and probably only one) that has 100% compliance by 100% of the people. The Time Act states that daylight saving time “shall be reckoned as one hour ahead of standard time” and everyone in the province dutifully changes their clocks twice a year, albeit perhaps grudgingly. On October 6, 2020, a private member’s bill was introduced in the legislature to amend the Time Act to make daylight saving time the standard time year-round. Previous attempts have been unsuccessful. It can be hard to vary the reckoning of time.
Perhaps harder still at times is the implementation of sensible changes to corporate laws. Ontario passed the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 in (you guessed it) 2010 but the act has yet to come into force. The unhelpfully named and archaic Corporations Act continues to govern not-for-profit corporations in Ontario for the foreseeable future. As a result, we will only incorporate a not-for-profit corporation for a client under the Federal Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, which was introduced around the same time as Ontario’s version (and with the same name) but came into force more expeditiously.
Forum shopping like this is often a compelling motivation for a government to change a law. Jurisdictions that can modernize their legislation faster like the Feds did with their not-for-profit legislation get more cash in the door ($200 to incorporate online; $250 by mail). Attempts to amend the Time Act have previously failed in large part because Ontario doesn’t want to be out of step with neighbouring provinces and states. (The last time the Time Act was amended was in 1987, to synchronize our watches with the United States when they changed the start date for daylight saving time.) Like any business with pressure on the bottom line, governments compete with each other and don’t want to be out of step.
Amendments to the OBCA
Ontario is taking steps in the right direction with its proposed amendments announced on October 6, 2020 to the Business Corporations Act (the “OBCA”). The amendments are contained in Bill 213, Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020. It was introduced by the Associate Minister of Small Business and Red Tape Reduction. (Monty Python would be proud.)
Director Residency Requirements to be Removed
The OBCA currently requires that at least 25% of the directors of a corporation incorporated in Ontario shall be resident Canadians. The residency requirement used to be common in most jurisdictions in Canada as a way of boosting Canadian participation in boardrooms. We benefit from it by offering director services where we provide an individual to act as a Canadian resident director.
However, many jurisdictions in Canada have removed the director residency requirement. It is one of the most significant factors when determining where to incorporate (see SkyLaw’s blog on incorporation). British Columbia in particular has become a common jurisdiction of incorporation, primarily because it does not have this residency requirement. We coordinate so many British Columbia incorporations each year through our local agent in Vancouver that we once even thought of opening a Vancouver office.
In addition, many companies continue out of Ontario into British Columbia specifically to avoid the residency requirement. In July of this year, Cronos Group, which is listed on the TSX and NYSE, continued from Ontario (where it was originally incorporated under the OBCA) to British Columbia expressly so that it could have more flexibility with respect to the composition of their board of directors.
The jurisdiction of a corporation matters. Ontario’s Business Law Advisory Council’s excellent report from the Fall of 2016 studied the issue and noted that Ontario loses both income and influence when investors choose not to incorporate in Ontario or when they leave Ontario for another jurisdiction. Take the State of Delaware, for example: 89% of all U.S. initial public offerings last year were made by Delaware companies. Delaware courts hear the most pressing and significant corporate litigation matters in the country, making litigation one of the largest industries in the state. Delaware has achieved this status in large part by keeping its corporate statute modern and up-to-date.
Streamlining Shareholder Resolutions for Private Companies
Chasing shareholders for signatures on resolutions takes up a lot of our clerks’ time. Currently the OBCA requires shareholder resolutions to be either passed at a meeting or by a written resolution signed by 100% of the shareholders entitled to vote. For private companies (those that do not have a stock exchange listing), holding meetings for routine matters is costly and difficult, particularly during the pandemic. Even ensuring that 100% of the shareholders are accounted for can be tricky (see our blog on forgotten shareholders).
The proposed amendments to the OBCA would permit ordinary resolutions of shareholders to be passed by a written consent of a majority of the shareholders entitled to vote, instead of 100% of shareholders. This would not apply to special resolutions that require 66 2/3 % of shareholders to vote, which is the case for most significant matters, like an amendment to the articles or an amalgamation. Written consents for these matters would still require 100% of the voting shareholders to sign. In addition, the requirement to obtain the consent of all shareholders (including non-voting shareholders) to exempt a private corporation from the annual audit requirement will still be in place.
Governments can act fast when they want to (see the SkyLaw Summer Update on How a Bill Becomes a Law, COVID-style). They can also drag their feet (over ten years for the Ontario Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 to come into force!). The changes announced this month to the OBCA are important changes that we hope will come into force swiftly and keep investors coming to Ontario.
This blog post is not legal or financial advice. It is a blog which is made available by SkyLaw for informational purposes and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice from a lawyer.
This blog is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without our permission. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact us. We would be delighted to speak with you.
© SkyLaw . All rights reserved. SkyLaw is a registered trademark of SkyLaw Professional Corporation.