Safe Passage: SAFEs vs. Convertible Notes
Here are the key similarities, differences, and considerations to keep in mind about these two popular forms of investments.

In recent years, in seeking to align with global standards aimed at combating money laundering and tax evasion, Canada has taken significant steps toward enhancing corporate transparency, particularly concerning the identification of individuals with significant control (ISCs) over domestic corporations.
Both the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) governing federal corporations and the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (OBCA) governing Ontario corporations now mandate that private corporations maintain detailed records of their ISCs. However, there are some significant differences between the CBCA and the OBCA with respect to the kinds of information that are required to be maintained on ISCs and the extent to which such information is publicly disclosed.
As discussed in more detail below, public companies and their wholly owned subsidiaries are generally exempt from ISC requirements.
Here is a table of the key similarities and differences between the CBCA and the OBCA (more detailed discussion can be found below):

The following ISC information filed with Corporations Canada is made publicly available on the corporation’s public profile:
However, certain exceptions apply, such as for individuals under 18 years of age or those to whom prescribed circumstances apply.
Consistent with standard practice, the names and addresses for service of directors of a CBCA corporation are part of the public record.
Unlike with federal corporations, no information from the ISC register of an OBCA corporation is publicly accessible. Access is limited to specific authorities, including law enforcement, tax authorities, and certain regulatory bodies, for investigative and enforcement purposes.
As always, the names and addresses for service of an OBCA corporation’s directors and officers, along with the dates they assumed their roles, are publicly available.
Some federal and Ontario corporations are not required to comply with this obligation because their ISC information is already accessible elsewhere (e.g., under securities laws), or because they are fully owned by the Canadian government. The following types of corporations are exempt:
Many other Canadian provinces have also adopted measures to enhance corporate transparency by requiring private corporations to maintain records ISCs.
British Columbia is developing a public beneficial ownership registry, expected to be operational in the fall of 2025, making certain ISC information accessible to the public.
Quebec has taken a similar approach through its Enterprise Register (Registraire des entreprises), which already includes public disclosure of some beneficial ownership information for businesses registered in the province.
In Alberta, in addition to maintaining an ISC register, corporations must also keep separate internal records of their top five voting shareholders, including each shareholder’s name, address, and percentage of issued voting shares held. This shareholder information is collected as part of the annual return filing process, and becomes publicly available through each corporation’s profile.
We are dedicated to providing premium corporate and entity management services to our clients. We work with companies of all sizes and at all stages of their life cycle assisting with incorporations, business name registrations, maintenance of the minute books and more.
We also assist with the preparation, maintenance and filing (if applicable) of information relating to individuals with significant control for OBCA and CBCA corporations.
We keep and maintain minute books and records for over 1,000 corporations and partnerships. All records are fully scanned and made available to our clients through our online portal.
Feel free to contact our team and we would be delighted to assist.
© SkyLaw 2025. All rights reserved.
SkyLaw's blog does not contain legal or financial advice. It is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice from a lawyer. SkyLaw's blog posts are subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without permission. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact us. A member of our team would be delighted to speak with you.