Safe Passage: SAFEs vs. Convertible Notes
Here are the key similarities, differences, and considerations to keep in mind about these two popular forms of investments.

Stakebuilding investors in Canadian public companies have two key ownership thresholds to look out for: 10% and 20%.
For more information about what it takes to cross the 10% threshold, the implications of doing so, how to determine your securityholding percentage, and more, see our blog about crossing the 10% threshold.
Any offer by an investor to acquire outstanding voting or equity securities of a class of a reporting issuer made to one or more persons in Canada that would result in the investor, together with any of its joint actors, having beneficial ownership of and/or or control or direction over 20% or more of the outstanding securities of that class constitutes a take-over bid that requires an offer to be made to all securityholders, unless the offer is a step in a voting transaction (such as a plan of arrangement) or an exemption from the take-over bid requirement is available.
Any securities (including unissued securities) of the class that the investor is deemed to beneficially own are included in the number of outstanding securities for purposes of determining whether the 20% ownership threshold has been crossed.
Acquisitions of convertible securities or securities of an entity that itself holds securities in a reporting issuer therefore should be carefully planned as they may constitute indirect acquisitions to which the take-over bid requirement may apply.
Once an investor has beneficial ownership of, and/or control or direction over, 20% or more of the outstanding securities of a class, any further acquisitions of outstanding securities of that class by the investor or any joint actor also may constitute a take-overbid.
The take-over bid requirement does not apply to a private placement of newly issued securities from the issuer or the conversion or exercise of an outstanding security (such as a convertible debenture or warrant) into newly issued securities of the issuer, even if that leaves the investor with beneficial ownership of and/or control or direction over 20% or more of the securities of the issuer. However, any further acquisitions would then be subject to the take-over bid requirement.
Certain exemptions are available to the take-over bid requirement that allow investors to acquire more than 20% or to continue acquiring securities once having crossed the 20%threshold without being required to make an offer to all securityholders. The most common exemptions are as follows:
Privately negotiated acquisitions of securities by an investor from not more than five people are exempt from the take-over bid requirement subject to certain conditions, including that the value of the consideration paid for any of the securities is not greater than 115% of the market price (including brokerage fees or commissions)or value (if there is no published market for the securities) of the securities at the date of the acquisition.
If the investor knows or ought to know after reasonable inquiry that a seller acquired the securities from one or more other people to rely on the exemption or a seller is acting as a nominee or other legal representative (except in the case of certain trusts or estates) for one or more other people having a direct beneficial interest in the securities, each of those other people must be included in determining if the exemption is satisfied.
An investor’s acquisition of securities of an issuer is exempt from the take-over bid requirement if:
Canadian securities laws generally define a “control person” as any person or company, or combination of persons or companies acting in concert, that holds a sufficient number of voting rights attaching to voting securities of an issuer to affect materially the control of the issuer.
A person or company, or combination of persons or companies acting in concert, that holds more than 20%of the voting rights attached to voting securities of the issuer is deemed, in absence of evidence to the contrary, to hold a sufficient number of voting rights to affect materially the control of the issuer.
Therefore, once an investor acquires 20% or more of the voting rights of an issuer, they will be deemed to be a control person of the issuer. Whether an investor who holds less than 20% may also be considered a control person will depend on the particular facts and circumstances of each case.
Canadian securities laws impose certain obligations on control persons, including restrictions on the resale of securities by a control person, referred to as a “control distribution” or“control block distribution”. Any resale of securities from the holding of a control person is considered a distribution under securities laws, and requires the filing of a prospectus to qualify the distribution of the securities, unless an exemption from the prospectus requirement is available.
Advance planning is required for any sale of securities from a “control block”, as among other things a filing may be required to be made at least seven days before the trade.
The prospectus exemption available to all control persons is the advance notice exemption set out under section 2.8 of National Instrument 45-102 – Resale of Securities. This section provides for an exemption from the prospectus requirement for a distribution by a control person where:
To sell securities pursuant to this exemption, an investor must:
A Form 45-102F1 expires on the date which is the earlier of: (i) the date that the investor files the last of the insider reports on SEDI reflecting the sale of all securities referred to in the Form 45-102F1, and (ii) 30 days after it is filed. If the investor wishes to continue to sell securities from a control block, a new Form 45-102F1 must be filed.
A separate prospectus exemption may be available for a control block distribution by an investor that is an eligible institutional investor if, among other things:
If an investor has crossed the 10% ownership threshold they will be subject to early warning and insider reporting requirements, unless certain exemptions are available. See our blog about crossing the 10% threshold for more details.
Further acquisitions by the investor between 10% and 20% or acquisitions above 20% in reliance on one of the take-over bid exemptions may therefore need to be disclosed publicly, which would alert issuers and other market participants about an investor’s further accumulation of securities. Any changes in intentions with respect to the issuer from those disclosed in a previously filed early warning report also may need to be disclosed, even absent an acquisition of securities.
Once an investor has crossed the 20% ownership threshold, the “one business day moratorium” on further acquisitions after filing an early warning report no longer applies to the investor and its joint actors.
A stakebuilding investor should be mindful of whether the issuer has a shareholder rights plan (sometimes called a “poison pill”) in place. The ownership threshold in a typical shareholder-approved shareholder rights plan is 20%, although the plan should be carefully reviewed to confirm the activating threshold and determine how beneficial ownership is calculated. In 2024, a shareholder rights plan with a 15% beneficial ownership trigger was adopted by Bitfarms Ltd., an Ontario-based reporting issuer (also the plan was subsequently cease-traded by Ontario’s Capital Markets Tribunal).
If an issuer has a shareholder rights plan in place, an investor may be prevented from acquiring securities above the specified ownership threshold in reliance on an exemption from the take-over bid requirement, discussed above, without triggering the plan.
If an investor has crossed the 10% ownership threshold in the securities of a reporting issuer, Multilateral Instrument 61-101 may impose requirements on any further acquisitions of securities up to and beyond 20%. See our blog about crossing the 10% threshold for more details.
Many of the key considerations for a stakebuilding investor approaching the 20% ownership threshold will be similar to those for the 10% threshold. Approaching and crossing these thresholds is best done with the benefit of careful legal and tax planning.
© SkyLaw 2025. All rights reserved.
SkyLaw's blog does not contain legal or financial advice. It is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice from a lawyer. SkyLaw's blog posts are subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without permission. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact us. A member of our team would be delighted to speak with you.